Hi, you should consider that many shops are not sending in reports for various reasons. If youre working for Hollywood clients, many shops have to have a closed pipeline, i.e. workstations are not allowed to have internet access at all. In other cases, your clients may have other severe security demands, so for security concerns, artists are told to not send out reports by their TD/Supervisors. So only because you are receiving little reports doesn't mean Nuke is not crashing much. Don't get me wrong, i would love to find a convenient way to help you to make Nuke a more stable product. I'd be the first one to send in a report if it crashes on me. Just saying that the reality unfortunately often doesn't allow for that, at least in my experience.
Regards, Daniel Am 15.05.2015 um 11:59 schrieb Frank Harrison: > > ‘!!!’ or ‘!?!!’ > Those are amongst some of the more informative/polite ones :) Often the most > useful thing is noting what the the thing you changed/clicked/dragged > immediately before the crash i.e a Node's knob for example, a right-click > menu action, etc. > > > as I have got fed up filling the report in > That could be one cause of the drop in reporting, but I doubt it we get > different reporting stats per version. > > As I mentioned previously, the last common issue we know of (and have fixed > for a pending release) relates to Keylights and OFX nodes. We also have seen > some issue in python, we suspect this is due to custom scripts, but are > investigating. > > Improving the stability is incredibly important to us, so please report away. > > F > > On 15 May 2015 at 10:02, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Well you should have lots coming from me - usually marked ‘!!!’ or ‘!?!!’ etc > - as I have got fed up filling the report in. > ;) > > >> On 14 May 2015, at 18:42, Frank Harrison <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 14 May 2015 at 15:20, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> I’m suspecting that because Nuke9 seems somewhat flakey with more crashes >> than I had with 8 (apart from Tracker where the opposite was true) these are >> not being cleaned up. >> Hmm, our crash-report system would argue against 9 being more flaky than 8; >> that said, please, please let me (or support) know if you get any concrete >> repro steps for flakeyness :) >> >> Where you might see some issues, even in 9.0v5, are the occasional issues >> with Keylight and other OFX-based plugins when the requesting bounding box >> down-stream changes often, for example having Blur downstream of a Keylight >> and moving the size-slider - this is be fixed ready for the next v-release >> that is in the final stage of testing. >> >> F. >> -- >> Frank Harrison >> Senior Nuke Software Engineer >> The Foundry >> Tel: +44 (0)20 7968 6828 - Fax: +44 (0)20 7930 8906 >> Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk >> Email: [email protected] >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > -- > Frank Harrison > Senior Nuke Software Engineer > The Foundry > Tel: +44 (0)20 7968 6828 - Fax: +44 (0)20 7930 8906 > Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk > Email: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
