It's not a delivery format so it doesn't need a SPEC Name.   But just call
it RED 2k.

Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/



On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Joseph Goldstone <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> On Nov 28, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Ian Northrop <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think I’ve seen UHD used to describe this format.
>
>
> Then someone is really confused. UHD [technically UHDTV-1] is 3840 x 2160.
>
> Note that ITU and SMPTE terminology NEVER use the term “4K” for this;
> unfortunately both manufacturers (originally SONY but now everyone else
> too) and consumer electronics retailers (e.g. Best Buy or Costco) use “4K”
> when the device is really UHD. There are some genuine 4K displays coming
> out now — I have a lovely EIZO CG3184K on my desk — but those are now
> compelled to say “true 4K” because of the confusion previously sown.
>
> UHDTV-2 arrives in three years at 7680 x 4320. Just think about how many
> elements you’ll be able to have visible in Nuke’s node graph in UHDTV-2.
> Yum.
>
>
> El nov 28, 2016, a las 4:52 PM, Andrew Mumford <[email protected]>
> escribió:
>
> Is there a standard term for 2048x1152 yet people are using ?
>
> 2K_HD / HD_2K ?
>
> ---
> Andrew Mumford
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], https://protect-us.mimecast.
> com/s/pV3LB4i4N89H5?domain=forums.thefoundry.co.uk
> <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/>
> https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/LL6dB7H3MR6U3?domain=
> support.thefoundry.co.uk
> <http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast.
> For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to