Remember the ability to turn off the pixel aspect compensation in the viewer if things get confusing between square and non-square aspects throughout your tree.

On 2/02/17 4:03 AM, Luddnel Magne wrote:
Hi Franck,

Thanks, it Works with the DeepReformat, but its a little bit tricky cause the viewer show it correctly directly through the deep node.

Cheers.

555Lab
*Luddnel "SPIDER" Magne | DIRECTOR - LEAD 2D ARTIST - ASSOCIATE*
CREATIVE STUDIO - MOTION - DIGITAL - 3D PRINTING
104 rue de la Folie Méricourt 75011 Paris <http://goo.gl/maps/sP1EY>
Office +33 148 075 055 | Fax +33 148 070 044
Mobile +33 699 434 555 | 555lab.com <http://www.555lab.com/>

2017-01-31 5:10 GMT+01:00 Luddnel Magne <spi...@555lab.com <mailto:spi...@555lab.com>>:

    Thanks Franck,

    Right, i didn't think about using a deepReformat. I will try today
    and let you know.

    Cheers.


    555Lab
    *Luddnel "SPIDER" Magne | DIRECTOR - LEAD 2D ARTIST - ASSOCIATE*
    CREATIVE STUDIO - MOTION - DIGITAL - 3D PRINTING
    104 rue de la Folie Méricourt 75011 Paris <http://goo.gl/maps/sP1EY>
    Office +33 148 075 055 | Fax +33 148 070 044
    Mobile +33 699 434 555 | 555lab.com <http://www.555lab.com/>

    2017-01-31 5:07 GMT+01:00 Frank Rueter|OHUfx <fr...@ohufx.com
    <mailto:fr...@ohufx.com>>:

        Hm, indeed, that's a bit of a bug, isn't it?!

        Looks like you may have to throw a DeepReformat in before your
        DeepToPoints to format to a square pixel aspect.


        On 31/01/17 4:34 PM, Luddnel Magne wrote:
        Hi all,

        When i apply a Deeptopoint on a deep file with a anamorphique
        ratio the point cloud is totally stretch and mismatch to my
        source.

        (so impossible to comp)

        Had someone ever  have this issue ? how can i fix this ?

        Thanks for your help.

        Spider




        _______________________________________________
        Nuke-users mailing list
        Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
        <mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>,http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ 
<http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/>
        http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
        <http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users>
        _______________________________________________ Nuke-users
        mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
        <mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>,
        http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
        <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/>
        http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
        <http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users>


_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to