A. M. Archibald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the rules for datatype conversion in ufuncs? Does ufunc(a,b)
> always yield the smallest type big enough to represent both a and b?
> What is the datatype of ufunc.reduce(a)?
>
This is an unintended consequence of making add.reduce() reduce over at
least a ("long"). I've fixed the code so that only add.reduce and
multiply.reduce alter the default reducing data-type to be long. All
other cases use the data-type of the array as the default.
Regarding your other question on data-type conversion in ufuncs:
1) If you specify an output array, then the result will be cast to the
output array data-type.
2) The actual computation takes place using a data-type that all
(non-scalar) inputs can be cast to safely (with the exception that we
assume that long long integers can be "safely" cast to "doubles" even
though this is not technically true).
-Travis
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
