On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Eric Firing apparently wrote: > I suspect that many other people will trip over the lack > of && in the same way that I have, and will similarly > consider it an irritant that we work around because we > have to, not because it is good.
I agree with this. In addition, turning to & when && is wanted will likely cause occasional stumbles over operator precedence. (At least I've been bitten that way.) But I do not see this changing unless Python grants the ability to define new operators, in which case I'm sure the wish lists will come out ... Cheers, Alan Isaac Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
