On 7/8/06, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1. H is just the complex counterpart of T.
Chuck
Hi all,
On 7/7/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I didn't compile the results, but the discussion on the idea of adding
> new attributes to the array object led to the following result.
>
> Added: .T attribute to mean self.transpose()
[...]
> .H
>
> A few were in favor, but this can now be written .T.conj() which is not
> bad so does not get a new attribute.
I didn't have strong feelings one way or another on this, so I didn't
vote, but at this point I'd like to make a comment before the freeze.
Given that .T went in, I'd argue that .H should be in as well.
Basically, I now think these two should have been considered as a
bundle and not as separate options.
+1. H is just the complex counterpart of T.
Chuck
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
