On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Norbert Nemec apparently wrote:
> else: # for compatibility:
> set = {}
> for item in inseq:
> set[item] = None
> if sort:
> return asarray(sorted(set.keys()))
> else:
> return asarray(set.keys())
I'm currently in major caffeine deficit,
but aside from backward compatability,
how is this better than:
else: #for compatability
items = list(set(inseq))
if sort: items.sort()
return asarray(items)
Alan Isaac
PS Actually, making a list of a set may already sort?
No time to check now ...
PPS For to 2.3, need set = sets.Set
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
