And Trac seems to be letting me in again. Not sure what was wrong there.
--bb
On 8/18/06,
Nils Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
> If you do this:
> >>> numpy.linalg.eig(numpy.random.rand(3,3))
>
> You'll (almost always) get a wrong answer back from numpy. Something
> like:
>
> (array([ 1.72167898, -0.07251007, -0.07251007]),
> array([[ 0.47908847, 0.72095163, 0.72095163],
> [ 0.56659142, -0.46403504, -0.46403504],
> [ 0.67040914, 0.01361572, 0.01361572]]))
>
> The return value should be complex (unless rand() just happens to
> return something symmetric).
>
> It really needs to either throw an exception, or preferably for this
> function, just go ahead and return something complex, like the
> numpy.dft functions do.
> On the other hand it, would be nice to stick with plain doubles if the
> output isn't complex, but I'd rather get the right output all the time
> than get the minimal type that will handle the output.
>
> This is with beta 1.
>
> Incidentally, I tried logging into the Trac here:
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/scipy
> to file a bug, but it wouldn't let me in under the account I've been
> using for a while now. Is the login system broken? Were passwords
> reset or something?
>
>
> --bb
>
> -
AFAIK this problem is fixed.
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/215
I have no problem wrt the Trac system.
Nils
-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
