On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:22:52 -0700 Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:12, Bill Baxter wrote: > > The thing that I find I keep forgetting is that abs() is a built-in, but > > other simple functions are not. So it's abs(foo), but numpy.floor(foo) > > and numpy.ceil(foo). And then there's round() which is a built-in but > > can't be used with arrays, so numpy.round_(foo). Seems like it would > > be more consistent to just add a numpy.abs() and numpy.round(). > > > > Regarding the original subject: > a) "absolute" is impractically too much typing and > b) I just thought some (module-) functions might be "forgotten" to be put > in as (object-) methods ... !? Four-line change, so I added a.abs() (three lines for array, one for MaskedArray). -- |>|\/|< /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ |David M. Cooke http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/ |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion