Pierre GM schrieb: > On Sunday 12 November 2006 17:08, A. M. Archibald wrote: >> On 12/11/06, Keith Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Is anybody interested in making x.max() and nanmax() behave the same >>> for matrices, except for the NaN part? That is, make >>> numpy.matlib.nanmax return a matrix instead of an array. > > Or, you could use masked arrays... In the new implementation, you can add a > mask to a subclassed array (such as matrix) to get a regular masked array. If > you fill this masked array, you get an array of the same subclass. >
That is very interesting, but I agree with Keith and would actually call this a bug. (If still present in 1.0, that is, haven't checked, I think Keith used some rc?.) One proclaimed goal of numpy for the 1.0 release has been to be as matrix-friendly as possible, for which I am very grateful. Still, the use of masked arrays looks more attractive every time they're mentioned... -sven ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
