Hi Matthew, > it seems to me that we could get 80% of the way to a reassuring blueprint > with a relatively small amount of effort.
My sentence "adapt the typical academic rule for conflicts of interests to PRs, that non-trivial ones cannot be merged by someone who has a conflict of interest with the author, i.e., it cannot be a superviser, someone from the same institute, etc." was meant as a suggestion for part of this blueprint! I'll readily admit, though, that since I'm not overly worried, I haven't even looked at the policies that are in place, nor do I intend to contribute much beyond this e-mail. Indeed, it may be that the old adage "every initiative is punishable" holds here... would you, or one of the others who feels it is important to have a blueprint, be willing to provide a concrete text for discussion? All the best, Marten _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
