My thoughts exactly. Gaël
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 10:31:33AM +1000, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote: > I’m with Nathaniel on this one. Subclasses make code harder to read and reason > about because you now have to be sure of the exact type of things that users > are passing you — which are array-like but subtly different. > On 2 Jul 2017, 9:46 AM +1000, Marten van Kerkwijk <m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com>, > wrote: > I'm not sure there is *that* much against a class that basically just > passes through views of itself inside `__matmul__` and `__rmatmul__` > or calls new gufuncs, but I think the lower hurdle is to first get > those gufuncs implemented. > -- Marten > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion -- Gael Varoquaux Researcher, INRIA Parietal NeuroSpin/CEA Saclay , Bat 145, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette France Phone: ++ 33-1-69-08-79-68 http://gael-varoquaux.info http://twitter.com/GaelVaroquaux _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
