On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:49 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Just looking for opinions and feedback on the need to keep NumPy from > having a hard nose/pytest dependency. The options as I see them are: > > pytest is never imported until the tests are run -- current practice > with nose > pytest is never imported unless the testfiles are imported -- what I > would like > pytest is imported together when numpy is -- what we need to avoid. > Currently the approach has been 1), but I think 2) makes more sense > and allows more flexibility.
I am not quite sure about everything here. My guess is we can do whatever we want when it comes to our own tests, and I don't mind just switching everything to pytest (I for one am happy as long as I can run `runtests.py` ;)). When it comes to the utils we provide, those should keep working without nose/pytest if they worked before without it I think. My guess is that all your options do that, so I think we should take the one that gives the nicest maintainable code :). Though can't say I looked enough into it to really make a well educated decision, that probably means your option 2. - Sebastian > Thoughts? > Chuck > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
