On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Jarrod Millman <mill...@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> I was planning on looking at/working on the main doc generating system > and the main webpage (for numpy and scipy) soon (over the winter > break), but I didn't want to get too many things in the discussion > right now. My immediate interest is getting agreement on the first > two items: > > - A purpose and process NEP based on PEP 1 and a few other projects. > - A draft NEP template. > +1 thanks Jarrod. And thanks Nelle for offering to work on the automation! Ralf > I am ambivalent about whether we need a separate repo. My immediate > plan is start drafting text as a PR to numpy/doc/neps on Thursday > (assuming no major objections arise before then). That way we can > discuss the NEP purpose/process and template docs, while I look into > the build system. I was imaging doing something similar to what I did > for for networkx this summer: > https://networkx.github.io/ > The latest docs are autogenerated whenever a PR is merged into master: > https://networkx.github.io/documentation/latest/ > > I will look into the scipy system as well and make sure we don't have > an explosion of systems. > Note that the build/doc/release systems of numpy and scipy are ~95% common (because they're mostly maintained by the same people), so syncing improvements between numpy and scipy will almost always require the least effort. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion