On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 11:35 +0000, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Eric Wieser > <wieser.eric+nu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Did recarrays change? I didn’t see anything in the release notes. > > > > Not directly, but structured arrays did, for which recarrays are > > really just > > a thin and somewhat buggy wrapper. > > Oh dear oh dear - for some reason I had completely missed these > changes, and the justification for them. > > They do exactly the kind of thing that Konrad Hinsen was complaining > about before, with justification, which is to change the behavior of > previous code, without an intervening (long) period of raising an > error. In this case, the benefits of these changes seem small, > compared to the inevitable breakage and silently changed results they > will cause. > > Is there any chance of reversing them? >
Without knowing the change, there is always a chance of (temporary) reversal and for unexpected complications its probably the safest default if there is no agreement anyway. - Sebastian > Cheers, > > Matthew > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
