I actually had to think a lot, read docs, use SO and so on to realise what those meant the first time around, I didn’t understand them on sight.
And I had to keep coming back to the docs from time to time as I wasn’t exactly using them too much (for exactly this reason, when some problems could be solved more simply by doing just that). I’d prefer something that sticks in your head and “underscore” for “indexing” didn't do that for me. Of course, this was my experience as a first-timer. I’d prefer not to up the learning curve for others in the same situation. An experienced user might disagree. :-) Best Regards, Hameer Abbasi Sent from Astro <https://www.helloastro.com> for Mac On 26. Jun 2018 at 10:28, Eric Wieser <wieser.eric+nu...@gmail.com> wrote: Another thing I’d say is arr.?index should be replaced with arr.?idx. Or perhaps arr.o_[] and arr.v_[], to match the style of our existing np.r_, np.c_, np.s_, etc? _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
