Say we add a constructor to the polynomial base class that looks something
like this:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@classmethod
def literal(cls, f):
def basis_function_getter(self, deg):
coefs = [0]*deg + [1]
return lambda _: cls(coefs)
basis = type('',(object,),{'__getitem__': basis_function_getter})()
return f(basis, None)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then the repr for, say, a Chebyshev polynomial could look like this:
>>> Chebyshev.literal(lambda T,x: 1*T[0](x) + 2*T[1](x) + 3*T[2](x))
Does this sound like a good idea to anyone?
Max
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Eric Wieser <wieser.eric+nu...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Since the one of the arguments for the decreasing order seems to just be
>>> textual representation - do we want to tweak the repr to something like
>>>
>>> Polynomial(lambda x: 2*x**3 + 3*x**2 + x + 0)
>>>
>>> (And add a constructor that calls the lambda with Polynomial(1))
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>
>> IIRC there was a proposal for that. There is the possibility of adding
>> renderers for latex and html that could be used by Jupyter, and I think the
>> ordering was an option.
>>
>
> See https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8893 for the proposal. BTW, if
> someone would like to work on this, go for it.
>
> Chuck
>
>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
