Also, not to be a complete slacker, I'd like to add to this list; - How can I help as an external lib maintainer? - Do you even want us to get involved before the final draft? Or wait until internal discussion finishes?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 1:23 PM Peter Andreas Entschev <pe...@entschev.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > During the discussion about NEP-35, there have been lots of > discussions around the NEP process itself. In the interest of allowing > people who are mostly interested in this discussion and to avoid > drifting so much off-topic in that thread, I'm starting this new > thread to discuss the NEP procedure. > > A few questions that have been raised so far: > > - Is the NEP Template [1] a guideline to be strictly followed or a > suggestion for authors? > - Who should decide when a NEP is sufficiently clear? > - Should a NEP PR be merged at all until it's sufficiently clear or > should it only be merged even in Draft state only after it's > sufficiently clear? > - What parts of the NEP are necessary to be clear for everyone? Just > Abstract? Motivation and Scope? Everything, including the real > technical details of implementation? > - Would it be possible to have proof-readers -- preferably people who > are not at all involved in the NEP's topic? > > Please feel free to comment on that and add any major points I might > have missed. > > Best, > Peter > > [1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/doc/neps/nep-template.rst > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
