On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:37 AM Daniele Nicolodi <dani...@grinta.net> wrote:
> On 24/11/2020 10:25, Thomas wrote: > > Like Nathaniel said, it would not improve much when compared to the > > modulo operator. > > > > It could handle the edge cases better, but really the biggest benefit > > would be that it is more convenient. > > Which edge cases? Better how? > > > And as the "unwrap" function already exists, > > The unwrap() function exists because it is not as trivial. > I agree, we prefer not to add trivial functions like this. To help those few people that may need this, maybe just add the one-liner Daniele gave to the Notes section of unwrap()? Cheers, Ralf > > people would expect that > > and look for a function for the inverse operation (at least I did). > > What is your use of a wrap() function? I cannot think of any. > > Cheers, > Dan > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
