On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:50 PM Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:47 AM Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:04 AM Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 4:41 PM Matti Picus <matti.pi...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> This message ended up in my spam box for some reason, sorry for the >>>> late >>>> reply. >>>> >>>> >>>> We typically release a new version twice a year, and support two >>>> versions at a time. So right now we are releasing version 1.20 and will >>>> support 1.19 and 1.20 for the next period. When 1.21 is released, we >>>> will support 1.20 and 1.21. Support for the released version is limited >>>> to bug fixes. >>>> >>> >>> Is this two-version thing actually something we're committed to doing? >>> Chuck started doing it at some point, which as release manager is his >>> decision - but I don't think we ever really decided or announced this as a >>> policy. >>> >>> If we're committed to it, we should probably mention it somewhere in the >>> docs or release how-to. And I should go update our Tidelift data. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Ralf >>> >>> We only support *one* version at a time. Supporting two is hard, >> backports become difficult. The only time we have supported two was the >> 1.16.x LTS release. At the moment things are a bit different because we are >> waiting on pyarrow before releasing 1.20.0, it is a temporary measure. >> >> The binannual release cycle is because 300-500 merges per release felt >> about right. If the merge rate goes way up and stays there we may release >> more often. But that is unlikely unless we get a lot more support. >> > Thanks for clarifying Chuck, that all makes perfect sense. Cheers, Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion