On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, at 11:12, ALFONSO LUIS CASTAÑO MARIN wrote: > To what potential PEP are you referring exactly? Type arithmetic or > automatically interpret `1` as `Literal[1]` wherever it makes sense?
I guess both, but particularly the first (using standard operators in type definitions). The first seems pretty unwieldy without the second, though. > Indeed to have a common repository with an initial document would be a good > way to go. So far we did not start anything because the PEP on Variadics was > still waiting for appoval. However, we also wanted to make sure that Numpy > folks believe that this approach towards type arithmetic makes sense for > their use cases. > Maybe we could sync on this on the next Numpy Development meeting? We have a "triage" meeting this coming Wednesday at 11am Pacific, which would be a good venue for discussing these details. Best regards, Stéfan
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
