On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:33 PM Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 5:17 AM Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.z...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > That’s just the way Python’s syntax works. Operators are not names that 
>> > can be resolved to objects that can be compared with the `is` operator. 
>> > Instead, when that operator is evaluated in an expression, the Python 
>> > interpreter will look up a specially-named method on the operand object 
>> > (in this case `__invert__`). Numpy array objects implement this method 
>> > using `np.invert`.
>>
>> If so, which is symlink to which, I mean, which is the original name,
>> and which is an alias?
>
>
> "symlink" and "alias" are probably not the best analogies. The implementation 
> of `np.ndarry.__invert__` simply calls `np.invert` to do the actual 
> computation.

It seems that the above calling/invoking logic/mechanism is not so
clear or easy to understand/figure out only by reading the document,
say, by the following commands in IPython:

import numpy as np
help(np.invert)
np.invert?
np.info(np.invert)

Regards,
HY
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to