On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 1:46 PM Jouke Witteveen <j.wittev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:51 PM Andras Deak <deak.and...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:39 PM Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> the `np.ndenumerate` does not work well for masked arrays (like many > >> main namespace functions, it simply ignores/drops the mask). > >> > >> There is a PR (https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/20020) to add a > >> version of it to `np.ma` (masked array specific). And we thought it > >> seemed reasonable and were planning on putting it in. > >> > >> This version skips all masked elements. An alternative could be to > >> return `np.ma.masked` for masked elements? > > > > Would it be a bad idea to add a kwarg that specifies this behaviour (i.e. > > offering both alternatives)? Assuming people might need the masked items to > > be there under certain circumstances. Perhaps when zipping masked data with > > dense data?
I appended a commit to the PR that implements the kwarg for optionally yielding masked elements. Regards, - Jouke _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
