On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:05 AM <kawakam...@fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the reply.
>
> To tell the truth, I am working on a trial implementation for SVE.
> https://github.com/kawakami-k/numpy/commits/sve
> At this time, some test patterns still fail, so I'm fixing them. When I
> finish this work, I would like to contribute it to NumPy.
>
> As for my test environment, I use Fujitsu FX700 [0] that equips Fujitsu
> A64FX as its CPU. A64FX is based on Armv8.2-a and supports the SVE
> instruction set. I am not aware of any free SVE environment available in
> the cloud.
>
> If we can run Python and NumPy on qemu-aarch64 running on x64, can we do
> validation with qemu-aarch64? For example, oneDNN uses such method [1][2]
> to test its implementation for SVE.
>

I'd say yes, we can do that. We are supporting other SIMD instructions that
we don't test in CI, so if it works on qemu during PR review then I think
that's enough.

Clearly there's a potential for issues here when we gain more SIMD support
that is not exercised in CI, so maybe we need a test strategy longer term
where we can run things under qemu at least in a weekly CI job or so (qemu
in regular CI isn't feasible, too slow).

Cheers,
Ralf


>
> [0]
>
> https://www.hpcwire.com/2019/11/12/cray-fujitsu-both-bringing-fujitsu-a64fx-based-supercomputers-to-market-in-2020/
>
> [1]
>
> https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDNN/blob/master/.github/automation/.drone.yml#L129-L139
>
> [2]
> https://cloud.drone.io/oneapi-src/oneDNN/1401
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
> Member address: ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to