On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 6:01 AM Petr Viktorin <encu...@gmail.com> wrote: > And if the CPython API is lacking, it would be best to solve that in > CPython.
+1 In some ways, new CPython APIs would be the most important artifacts of this discussion. We want to minimize the effort it takes to support multiple interpreters. So we definitely want to know what we could provide that would help. > Per-interpreter GIL is an *additional* step. I believe it will need its > own opt-in mechanism. But subinterpreter support is a prerequisite for it. Yeah, that is an evolving point of discussion in PEP 684. -eric _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
