On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 3:43 PM Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net>
wrote:

> On Fri, 2022-11-11 at 17:03 +0300, Evgeni Burovski wrote:
> > > (2) a more important one, the `.c.src` format. In SciPy we got rid
> > > of it, and we're not going to make Meson understand an ad-hoc
> > > templating method that only NumPy uses. So we have two choices:
> > > also get rid of it, or write a new custom preprocessing utility for
> > > NumPy's Meson build. I think we have too much code using it to
> > > remove it, so probably should go with the "new utility" option. But
> > > in case we did want to get rid of it, now would be a good time.
> >
> > As a comment from a peanut gallery, where the project board is not
> > even visible (https://github.com/orgs/numpy/projects/7/views/7 404s
> > for me --- it would be perfectly understandable if you prefer to keep
> > it visible to select individuals!), and it has probably been
> > discussed
>
> Whoops, got distracted:  I made it publicly visible.  I assume that was
> the intention and invisible is just the default.
>

Yes, definitely intended, thanks for fixing that. I didn't notice that it
was set up as private, that's just my inexperience with the new GitHub
Projects interface.

Cheers,
Ralf



> - Sebastian
>
>
> > before: any thoughts to change it to e.g. tempita templating?
> > Translating .c.src templates to .c.in is straightforward if tedious,
> > as e.g. SciPy transition showed.
> > This is of course quite a bit of work, but so is a new utility.
> > Again, just throwing it out there :-).
>

The utility isn't from-scratch new, it's more the boring job of refactoring
one of the numpy.distutils parts that should survive as a standalone thing.

Cheers,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to