Hi Matti,

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022, at 06:20, Matti Picus wrote:
> I am writing to the list for visibility: I opened an issue [0] about 
> adding the Cirrus CI provider to take over some of the CI task runners 
> from travis.com. We have been experiencing strange timeouts on the 
> travis runs, and in general the platform does not feel stable. SciPy 
> made the transition about two months ago and seem to be satisfied.
>
> Thoughts?

I don't see why not. Increased stability, slower reduction of Travis credits, 
better CI runtime through implicit parallelization. Besides, it's easy enough 
to go back.

Stéfan
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to