On 21/12/22 06:41, Andrew Nelson wrote:
Maybe we should have a scientific-python wide discussion of what platforms we wish to support, like NEP 29 for python versions. The NEP should include some mechanism for adding new platforms. It doesn't make sense to me to be testing something on SciPy's CI if we are not testing it in NumPy.On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 07:29, Andrew Nelson <andyf...@gmail.com> wrote: In https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/17630 we're seeing some issues (amongst others) with the scipy test suite that uses numpy==1.24.0 on musllinux. I was wondering if numpy would like to add a musllinux CI entry? This would help prepare for a musllinux wheel.From local testing in a docker container there are currently several test fails and at least one segfault on numpy main with `musllinux_x86_64`.
As for musllinux: if we decided to go ahead I think we should proceed cautiously with CirrusCI. We are still learning its limitations. Maybe we should add the CI run to github actions instead?
Matti _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
