On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 20:34, <norbertpiotraduc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Surely you can do this for all functions of eg.nan*. Why separate them is > the only thing that distinguishes them. Setting the parameter seems to be > more handy and user-friendly. Well for me it's seems better to do it right > away in NumPy 2.0 >
I think I prefer the clearer intent of having nan* functions.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
