On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 22:18, Marten van Kerkwijk <m...@astro.utoronto.ca> wrote: > > I also note that for complex numbers, `vecmat` is defined as `x†A`, > i.e., the complex conjugate of the vector is taken. This seems to be the > standard and is what we used for `vecdot` too (`x†x`). However, it is > *not* what `matmul` does for vector-matrix or indeed vector-vector > products (remember that those are possible only if the vector is > one-dimensional, i.e., not with a stack of vectors). I think this is a > bug in matmul, which I'm happy to fix. But I'm posting here in part to > get feedback on that.
Does matmul not mean "matrix multiplication"? There is no conjugation in matrix multiplication. Have I misunderstood what matmul is supposed to be? (If it does mean anything other than matrix multiplication then it is an extremely poor choice of name.) -- Oscar _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
