> What were your conclusions after experimenting with chained ufuncs? > > If the speed is comparable to numexpr, wouldn’t it be `nicer` to have > non-string input format? > > It would feel a bit less like a black-box.
I haven't gotten further than it yet, it is just some toying around I've been doing. But I'd indeed prefer not to go via strings -- possibly numexpr could use a similar mechanism to what I did to construct the function that is being evaluated. Aside: your suggestion of the pipe led to some further discussion at https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/25826#issuecomment-1947342581 -- as a more general way of passing arrays to functions. -- Marten _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
