Personally, I wouldn't (as a maintainer) take a decision to reject code based 
on if I feel it is generated by AI. It is much easier to rule on the quality of 
the contribution itself, and as noted, at least so far the AI only 
contributions are very probably not going to clear the barrier of being useful 
in their own right.

We are a large, visible project, but I think it is weirder to have a policy and 
fail to enforce it (e.g. don't use NumPy for military purposes, never us an AI 
tool etc). than to not have a specific policy at all.

--- Rohit

On 7/4/24 3:03 PM, Daniele Nicolodi <dani...@grinta.net> wrote:
On 04/07/24 12:49, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to top-post!  But - I wanted to bring the discussion back to
> licensing.  I have great sympathy for the ecological and code-quality
> concerns, but licensing is a separate question, and, it seems to me,
> an urgent question.

The licensing issue is complex and it is very likely that it will not get a definitive answer until a lawsuit centered around this issue is litigated in court. There are several lawsuits involving similar issues ongoing, but any resolution is likely to take several years.

Providing other, much more pragmatic and easier to gauge, reasons to reject AI generated contributions, I was trying to sidestep the licensing issue completely.

If there are other reasons why auto-generated contributions should be rejected, there is no need to solve the much harder problem of licensing: we don't want them regardless of the licensing issue.

Cheers,
Dan

_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: rgosw...@quansight.com

_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to