Hi, On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 3:17 PM Adrin <adrin.jal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > FWIW, as Loïc already mentioned, we had the same discussions on the > scikit-learn side. > > We noticed every now and then a few issues / PRs would come which were > clearly AI generated, and in almost all those cases, the account posting them > didn't look like a human / didn't have a history on GH. > > At the end, practically speaking, we know people use AI generated code (a > bunch of us use copilot ourselves). So the issue wasn't that we didn't want > any AI generated code, people use AI and there's no way around it. However, > we wanted to be able to tell people that completely AI generated code / > issues are not acceptable, and came up with this text: > >> Please refrain from submitting issues or pull requests generated by >> fully-automated tools. Maintainers reserve the right, at their sole >> discretion, >> to close such submissions and to block any account responsible for them. > > >> >> Ideally, contributions should follow from a human-to-human discussion in the >> form of an issue. > > > Another point not included here, but we like, is to say that "if you use AI, > you should only submit code which you really understand".
Just to say - that I've noticed, because I teach a lot of students, that people tend to greatly overestimate the level to which they understand maths or code generated by someone / something else. Cheers, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
