Hi,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 1:16 PM Andrew Nelson <andyf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, 22:08 slobodan.miletic--- via NumPy-Discussion > <numpy-discussion@python.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am writing on behalf of my team from Endava company. Our task is to work >> with opensource community, and setup multiple applications for use on win11 >> arm64 machines. >> One of the tasks is to understand the problems and if possible help NumPy >> team in setting up win11 arm64 compatible wheel on the PyPi. >> I saw that there were some earlier discussions about this subject, and as I >> understood problem was that at that moment this configuration was not so >> common and there were no appropriate CI slaves to create the wheel. >> Today there are more devices in this configuration available on the market >> and additional are announced, so I wanted to check if there are plans for >> creating this wheel, and if we can somehow help with that work? > > > > This is discussed in detail in https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/22530. > TLDR - we need CI providers to offer win arm before it's sensible to make > wheels. Firstly because we need to make them (less secure to upload wheels > not made on CI infra), secondly because we need to test them. If less tested > wheels give rise to lots of issues reported by the community, then this > generates large maintainer workload. > Would it make sense for a company to set up and maintain some self-hosted workflow runners? https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners/managing-self-hosted-runners/using-self-hosted-runners-in-a-workflow Cheers, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
