It seems to me that we should only endorse SPECs that we ourselves implement, otherwise it is kind of "do as I say, not as I do". For instance, it would be strange to endorse SPEC0 but stay with NEP 29. If we are to endorse SPEC0 without changing our version end-of-life timing, we should at least modify NEP 29 with some commentary about why we chose not to implementing SPEC0. If a SPEC is not relevant, then I don't think the NumPy project (as a project) can have an opinion on whether it is "good" for other projects. Individual contributors can of course endorse whatever they want, but as a project we should only weigh in when it is relevant to our community experience Matti
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 1:04 PM Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > > Hi all, > > TL;DR: NumPy should endorse some or all of the new SPECs if we like > them. If you don't or do like them, please discuss, otherwise I > suspect we will propose and endorsing them soon and do it if a few core > maintainers agree. > ... > Cheers, > > Sebastian _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
