Hi,

On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 4:15 PM Marten van Kerkwijk via
NumPy-Discussion <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > So "No AI contribution is allowed" is a valid take for me if that
> > would be the policy. Or "we will use common sense and make opinionated
> > decisions, for trivial and otherwise laborious tasks we don't care but
> > for involved bits, we won't touch it". It is also fine.
>
> I'd be happy with either too, with a preference for the second one,
> which I see as allowing AI as a tool.
>
> Disclosure has to be key, though.
>
> Note that while both would at least somewhat address copyright issues,
> only the first would address the pain of having to deal with AI slop.
>
> To me it remains the bigger problem [1], one I don't see how we can
> address without something like a web of trust.  But I'll let this be the
> last time I note it here, since arguably it is a different discussion,
> and also at numpy I'm not one directly affected as I rarely look at new
> PRs.  Instead, those who do look at new PRs should speak up on whether
> they are willing to filter AI slop.  But for what it is worth, for
> astropy, where I did often look at new PRs, I've concluded that AI slop
> is sufficiently shifting the balance towards misery that I will no
> longer look at anything unless I'm pinged.

Ouch - yes, that's understandable.   Related - Matt Haberland's
comment on the Scipy AI policy
https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/24583#pullrequestreview-3821660783

I wonder whether we'll reach the stage where there are two groups of
people in each project that accepts AI-generated code - those who are
prepared to review AI-generated PRs, and those who are not.   If so,
that could unintended effects, as parts of the code become more likely
to be AI-generated, parts less, depending on the reviewers.

Cheers,

Matthew
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/numpy-discussion.python.org
Member address: [email protected]

Reply via email to