On 12/04/07, Stefan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to write those tests! > > Failures may be expressed using > > NumpyTestCase.failIf(self, expr, msg=None)
That's not quite what I mean. There are situations, with the current code, that it gets the answer wrong (i.e., claims arrays may share memory when they don't). I know, and it's okay, and if it doesn't there's a bug, but in view of possible future enhancements, I don't want to signal an actual failure if it starts working. I do want to test it though, so I was hoping there was a way to express "I expect this test to fail, notify me if it doesn't, but don't call it a failure if it starts working". Anne _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
