On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > Then again, doubles aren't a group either because of this > imprecision, and I'm suggesting claiming they're > a subclass of that, so maybe there's room in a practical > language to make them a subclass of the rationals too.
Would using language from the Scheme report be useful when discussing this? http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/projects/scheme/documentation/scheme_5.html Cheers, Alan Isaac _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
