Nadav Horesh wrote: > The question should be: Are there members who rely on python 2.3
Numeric and numpy's user base has always been much more extensive than the list membership. I don't think that the question can be reformulated that way. I think we still do need to support Python 2.3. Being able to use the builtin set() rather than set.Set() is not a compelling use case. Libraries that are as fundamental as numpy is trying to be should try to maintain compatibility with the oldest versions of Python that are feasible. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
