Christopher Barker wrote: >Anne Archibald wrote: > > >>I implemented the Kuiper statistic and would be happy to >>contribute it to scipy (once it's seen a bit more debugging), but it's >>quite adequately described in the literature already, so it doesn't >>seem worth writing an article about it. >> >> > >It could be a very short article that refers the seminal papers in the >existing literature -- that would still be very helpful. > > > >>>2) I think it's scope should be limited to papers that describe >>>algorithms and code that are in NumPy / SciPy / SciKits. >>> >>> > >I don't see any reason to limit it -- honestly, the problem is more >likely to be too few articles than too many! Anything that would make >sense at the SciPy conference should be fair game. We might want to have >a clear structure that isolates the NumPy/SciPy/SciKits articles though. > > > I'm persuaded by this. Yes, we could handle this by the structure so that the code-explaining articles are clear. Perhaps two sections or two publication lists.
-Travis _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
