On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Charles R Harris apparently wrote: > We're avoiding consolidated fields because they behave > badly. ... The main problem with the consolidated fields > is that they are all put together as item lists in > a definition list and moved to the end of the docstring > when it is rendered. There is also little control through > the .css style sheet, they are all bulleted, and some of > the types are missing.
Is Ed Loper aware of this complaint? If so, has he indicated an interest (or lack) in addressing this complaint? Consolidated fields are great: it is a shame to do without them. Cheers, Alan Isaac _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
