On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:12:07PM +0100, Robin wrote: > On 10/8/07, Gael Varoquaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> r_[0:10] and c_[0:10]. > Does that suit you ? The first one is indeed only 1D, but I don't see > the > problem with that. If you really want 2D you can use c_[0:10].T . > Thanks, but not really :) > Firstly - for me I don' see any difference between the two, they both give > a numpy rank-1 array which doesn't have a row/column characteristic. > x.shape for both of the above is (10,) I need (10,1) or (1,10) for my > code. Damn it. Shame on me. I meant c_[0:10,]. If you really need a shape of (1,10) (I have never had such a need) you can use c_[0:10,].T. HTH, Gaƫl _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
