Hello On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Giles Thomas wrote:
> * Would it be better to try for some kind of "binary compatibility", > where we'd write some kind of "glue" that sat between the existing > C extension .pyd files and the IronPython engine? Our gut feeling > is that this would be much more work, but we might be missing > something. Along these lines, what ever happened to Sanghyeon Seo's CPython reflector? http://lists.ironpython.com/pipermail/users-ironpython.com/2006-June/002503.html I think it might be an avenue worth exploring, since this would also make other native modules available as a by-product. Last I heard, the JRuby folks were also trying something these lines for native MRI modules, using JNA (essentially, a Java equivalent to ctypes). Good luck with your project. I hope it succeeds. Cheers, Albert _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
