Thanks. I will try them later and let you know. Any chance to have those for 2.4 as well?:) If it works, I will be able to upgrade to matplotlib 0.90.1.... Regards woiski
On Nov 6, 2007 5:25 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Emanuel Woiski wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 4, 2007 6:18 PM, Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > On Nov 4, 2007 11:53 AM, Emanuel Woiski <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > I am havig a lot of trouble for quite some time wih numpy - > > scipy Windows > > > binaries for old AMD (pre-XP) processors. Since I teach in a lab > > with lots > > > of machines using that kind of processor, I got stuck with numpy > > 1.0rc2 and > > > scipy 0.5.1, which is, believe me, the only combination that > > woks...Well not > > > only tests fail but Python crashes! > > > FYI there are many people over the world still using not-so-recent > > > computers... > > > Yes I have tried s0.6 and n1.0.3.1 without success. > > > > Are you building from source? If so, have you tried the most recent > > development code? > > > > > > Nope, just WinXP (and WIn2000) binaries.... > The problem is a distribution problem (that is how the binaries were > built). Do you need optimized BLAS/LAPACK (for fast linear algebra) ? If > not, would you mind trying those ? > > > http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy-1.0.3.1.win32-py2.5.exe > > http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/scipy-0.6.0.win32-py2.5.exe > > Note that those do not use any optimized libraries (no ATLAS, no fftw, > etc...). This is the bare minimal to make it work on any x86 machine (no > need for SSE/SSE2). > > cheers, > > David > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
