Robert Kern wrote: > Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > > >> I don't think it is time to move wholesale to something like Mercurial >> or bzr. I would prefer it if all of the Enthought-hosted projects >> moved to the (new) system at once, which is not going to happen in the >> short term (but long term of course it's an open question). >> > > I think that's irrelevant. There is absolutely no reason that we should force > all of the Enthought-hosted projects to move in sync. It is relevant, because I have my hands in all of them. I don't want to have to keep up with too many different systems at once. Perhaps it's selfish and immaterial to others, but it is relevant to me. > We would have reason if we > were being asked to host a different centralized VCS with a complicated > server, > but hosting Mercurial or bzr is nearly trivial. We already do it for me: > > http://www.enthought.com/~rkern/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi > > The remaining thing we would have to support is the Trac integration. While > not > as trivial as simply hosting the repositories, it's not a very large > commitment. > > Trac integration is exactly what I'm thinking about. If it is easy, then it is not a big deal, but I have not seen arguments or evidence that it is the case (or suggestions of something to use other than Trac -- which is also a bigger deal for moving everything at once).
-Travis O. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
