> > > This is no longer the case, sincerely. I use C++ compilers from > > different vendors for some time, and I had almost no problem safe from > > some template depth issues. > C++ ability is not so much a problem with recent compilers, I agree. But > not all platforms are or can use a recent C++ compiler. In particular, > proprietary UNIX. Now, maybe that's something we do not want to support. > If we limit ourselves to gcc 4 and recent intel/MS compilers, then this > issue indeed is moot, at least for basic things.
Well, even for basic stuff, I have to say that GCC 4.0 can mysteriously crash (the SFINAE principle is not respected, 4.1 is fine in that matter), so using C++ is not worth the trouble now (and besides, I don't know what we could use right now that cannot be done "easily" in C) Matthieu -- French PhD student Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/ Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92 LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
