Charles R Harris wrote: > OK, so far I've knocked it down to 35KB by removing stuff I'm not > interested in. It is now smaller than Cog, and 7x larger than the file > we now use to do the same job. I'm pretty sure I can make it leaner than > that. It remains extensible.
Can you put a tarball up somewhere? Django generally requires environment variables to configure itself. There is a way to configure these from code, but it looks like that pulls in django.conf. This is my primary source of discomfort with using Django templates. My experience with using Django components outside of a Django web app has been frustrating. The more modifications we make, the more we have to maintain. And if any of it causes problems for someone trying to build numpy, that's more questions we need to answer. I want to answer numpy questions, not Django questions. I would be much, much more comfortable with an implementation that can simply be dropped in without modification. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
