Hi, > This cannot work, because the inplace operation does not > take place as a for loop. Well, this would be fine if I was assigning the values to tempories as you suggest. However, the operation should be performed inplace and this is what I don't understand - why is there no for loop? I think the semantics of these inplace indexed operations is intuitively quite clear and numpy doesn't follow this intuition. Would there be any interest in changing this behaviour in numpy?
> This is a FAQ. Sorry if i'm rehashing old ground, but the closest thing I could find to a numpy faq is here: http://www.scipy.org/FAQ. There seems to be no mention of this issue there. James _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
