On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > read relow... > > NumpyDocstrings category on the wiki, and suggest that we organise the > > functions underneath it according to their numpy subpackage, e.g. > > > > scipy.org/NumpyDocstrings/core/sort > > > > If you need to know where a function belongs, use IPython's "?" to inspect > it: > > > > In [4]: np.core.sort? > > [...] > > File: > > /Users/stefan/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/core/fromnumeric.py > > [...] > > > > Comment: I have read the module- or directory-name "core" many times > on this list, however: Who really knows where a given functions > belongs ? Isn't that mostly only the numpy svn commiters ? > In other words, using only the python side of numpy, someone (like > myself) would NOT know that sort is inside "core" ! > > Also: since >>> import numpy as N; N.sort refers already to that same sort: > >>> N.core.sort > <function sort at 0x01BACB30> > >>> N.sort > <function sort at 0x01BACB30> > > I would prefer not to require "core" sub-sub-page. > Instead, every name <X> that is accessible as N.<X> should be > documented without extra sub-page. > > My 2 cents. > Thanks, > Sebastian
Thats just a for placement. We can create all sorts of direct indexes, categories and cross-references, etc... -dieter _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
