On undefined, Timothy Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As to what to name it, if it did come to pass. I'm not happy 'keepshape' > since we'd not actually be keeping the shape, just the number of dimensions. > 'keepdims' is better, but still seem awkard. I'd prefer something like > 'reduce', so the signature would be a: > mean(axis=None, dtype=None, out=None, reduce=True).
I imagine we would end up adding this capability to the .reduce() method of all binary ufuncs, so 'reduce' seems ... odd. 'keeprank'? -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
